By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
SciFiBoy said:
Kasz216 said:
What do you want sources specifically?

After reading this article i looked up a number from many different newspapers.

Because the media has a way of misreporting things... for example this case.

im just pointing out that I gave my source, you have yet to give yours

yes, the media can represent, but what makes your sources more reliable than mine then? given that mine is one of the most reputable news companies in the world...

That's because i read about 15 different articles and his wikipedia entry.

Including the New York Times... which is right up there with the BBC.

What makes mine more reliable is... I read a whole lot more... and know a lot more about the case.

Wikipedia, well clearly that debunks the BBC...

the New York Times fair enough, unlike you I dont have the time to be going to loads of sources, hell I think you are the only one who did in this thread.

Edit: I think the personal attack on me when others didnt read all these other sources, was completley out of order by the way, also to note, when it comes to data/sources I would have thought that surely you knew that Quality is more important thatn Quantity. not neccessarily relevant in this case, but generally I think its worth noting.