SciFiBoy said:
im just pointing out that I gave my source, you have yet to give yours |
That's because i read about 15 different articles and his wikipedia entry.
Including the New York Times... which is right up there with the BBC.
What makes mine more reliable is... I read a whole lot more... and know a lot more about the case... instead of what the BBC selectivly fed you.
For example... that he was diagnosed after he was arrested. Did you know that?
Did you know he hacked into computers for something like a year straight?
Shutdown computers... said he was doing it because of US foreign policy?
Why did the BBC leave all that out?
The sources aren't so much better as... more sources = more information = more knowledge.








