NJ5 said:
Hacking into a computer doesn't necessarily make it more vulnerable. That's only the case if the hacker installs other backdoors after breaking in. If the guy was doing it to steal those secrets or endanger any lives, it's a different matter. That doesn't seem anywhere near reality here. If it wasn't the intention and it didn't happen, I don't think it justifies such a harsh sentence. I hope you're right on the sentence though!
|
The US government says his hacking cost the US government $700,000 to fix. So clearly he did something to those 90+ computers he hacked into to make them more vulnerable.
Outside that. The 60 years is a "Max" sentence. Why he did what he did, isn't relevent until sentencing.
Doesn't your country have "Max terms" for something... a limit to which someone can server for a certain crime?








