By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Barozi said:
perpride said:
Little on the high end IMO Barozi.

I'd give Assassins Creed 1 an 8/10. Solid storyline, great gameplay, and innovative as hell. This was probably the first game I played where free running was this fun. However, it's beyond repetitive.

Assassins Creed 2 on the other hand, get's a 9.4 easily. It took away almost every repetitive aspect of the first one and built on the good things. They polished the graphics more, added swimming, and made the story much more involving. In the first game, I felt like I was killing people because some dude gave me a list. In the second game, I felt like it was pretty much my characters duty to kill every person he did. They also added a shitload of weapons to the scenario. Without getting into the story too much, I will also say that the second one left me begging for more.

Like I said before, I didn't care so much that the first one was so repetitive, because I just adored the gameplay.

Other than that there wasn't so much to criticize anyway.

I agree. I thought the gameplay itself was near flawless. The controls especially. My problem was having to do the exact same thing for almopst every Assassination:

- Go to eagle point.

- Pickpocket someone.

- Listen in on a conversation.

- Assassinate Targer.

and you pretty much do that 9 times and it ends.

Assassins Creed 2 on the other hand, throws so many things into the mix, and really makes every single assassination unique in its own way. Whether it be because of the things you need to do to set the assassination up, or the actual kill itself.

Just my thoughts..