I'd have to agree.
Graphics: Really, no need for discussion there. The only people who say MW2 is better seem to be massive 360 fanboys (for the most part).
Controls: If you get used to KZ2's controls, they probably feel good, but I never really did. MW2 wins that round, purely because you don't have to learn anything new.
*gonna switch up the order a bit*
Single player Campaign: KZ2 wins this, as it actually takes time to play through and feels like a story. MW2's campaign is shockingly short and just feels like a bunch of set pieces that don't really fit together (7 hours on Veteran, when not rushing, is absolutely piss-poor for a campaign).
Multiplayer: KZ2 again, as it shook up online multiplayer a bit, whereas MW2 still feels like the same experience we had with COD4: MW and WaW (to a lesser extent with WaW). KZ2 on the other hand has more players + "bots", which add greatly to the experience.
Lasting Appeal: On the basis of the better single and multiplayer (hence the switching of order here), it has to go to KZ2. Really, I don't think MW2 does anything better than KZ2, except have the COD name attached to it.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
