LegendZelda on 24 November 2009
| rocketpig said: I don't get the point. He keeps talking about OoT yet TP was a very different game. WW was considerably different as well. I love the Zelda games whilst F3 felt like a bastardized (but decent) version of the original Fallout series. Basically, it comes across as if the writer simply wants the Zelda games to be bigger. Okay, that sounds cool. Maybe next generation. Not that I really care, though... if Nintendo continues to deliver a 25 hour game that offers tight controls and the "Zelda experience", I'll continue to buy the games and enjoy Big N's offerings. The writer doesn't seem to understand that Zelda isn't even an RPG, really. His analysis seems flawed on so many points. |
If by bigger you mean more interactive. That was the entire point of the entire article. Was how zelda could be more interactive and allow a closer connection with the world, people, and surrondings. I never said I wanted the world to be bigger or even hinted that I wanted it to be bigger.
