Kasz216 said:
Yeah, that's about what i figured. (And predicted.) More money in keeping things at the status quo. |
The interesting thing about this (to me) is this approach seems to be back-firing ,,,
While I could be wrong, there seems to be a lot of anger towards news organizations who haven't covered this yet or who are defending the scientists; and several "Pro-Global Warming" articles I saw today ended up having comments disabled after (roughly) 90% of comments posted were amazingly critical of the reporters.
From personal experience I know of a handful of people who I have argued with about Global Warming in the past who are now far more doubtful of the science because these scientists are not being made an example of. After all, the approach most hard-sciences would take towards someone faking results would be to discredit them to preserve the integrity of the field.
