JaggedSac on 23 November 2009
| superchunk said: Nintendo's solution is better and far more complex from a development point of view. MS is just adding a wiki to the game, Nintendo actually provided a way to visualize how to get past the issue quickly and allow the user to jump right back into the action. |
Yeah, that does sound better. But MS's solution requires very minimal(if any, perhaps an indicator providing the context) developer requirements and would be ubiquitous across games. Nintendo's solution would have to be done on a per game basis as it relies on rendering in game information to the player instead of just video, sounds, or text.
But I don't want this to be a Nintendo solution vs MS solution, the title came from the article.
