Akvod said:
Why? (I'm REALLY not trying to sound snippy. After your last post, I'm genuinely interested in your opinions. So again, I'm not trying to sound sarcastic or hostile or anything. Especially since I'm a console gamer and my experience of Battlefield has been Modern Combat for the PS2, BC 1 and BC2 Beta for the PS3). |
Same.
that's the reaason you don't know where i'm coming from.
You have to have played a pc battlefield to know that the franchise has a atmosphere the console versions lack, and I think that bad company 2 is the least of them all when it comes to the atmosphere. Bad company 1 for me was a really smaller version of battlefield 2. It's like they took battlefield 2 and stripped down and put it on consoles as bad company. Still the classes and weapons and vehicals, basically the core game was still there, it was just a smaller version.
Bad company 2 however is an entirely new gameplay style, far from what the pc versions of battlefield is. They changed it alot (and I apologise for speaking for everyone) and for me and most of my friends who have been playing battlefield since 1942, it not for the best. I think class based shooters should remain class based. What if one day in teamfortress the heavy was mixed with demo, and the pyro was mixed with the spy....... that would ruin the core of the game, and to some people who know what battlefield was that is what has happened. The class condensing as you called it should remain just a feature in this game. It would ruin bf3 for alot of people i know including myself.







