Solid_Raiden on 22 November 2009
I don't have a problem with their list, because it's hard to argue with someone else's opinion even if I personally find the list to be poor in a lot of places. I do have a problem with one thing. The list often times goes against what ratings they have given games. Most of the games that were awarded a 10 (something they really don't give many of) were beaten by many games that got lower. I usually respect GI when they give a ten because they do it very unoften and I have agreed with almost every one they have given. But this list suggests that games with lesser scores that came out the same generation and not more then a year apart are actually superior. It's confusing to me.
