well heck i have seen reviews that start out with "i ain't a big fan of this genre, or series" or even "I love this series or genre so much" both shoudl not be reviewing the game. Or at least lose all credibility for a just score.
They shoudl just write on their blog their own review. Otheriwise their is bais, which is not supposed to be in a review. star trek frist thing that popped in my mind, but what was the reason that kirk got command of the enterprise over spock. Because spock was too emotionally involved to be a good captain.
same as reviews, you can't trust a reviewer when they go into it hating it, or sucking its manhood. When that happens you see thigns like the wii reviews where some games have reviews ranging from 4-10 for just one game. or you have shooters that have a 5 hour singleplayer and lacking some multiplayer features get 10's. sorry but that is not a perfect game.
10 is supposed to be the pinnacle of gaming, and yet we have games that are missing things that have been in that genre before and done good. Or we have "professional" reviewers bringing their own bias into reviews in order to sway the industry to their favor, or due to money issues. Advertising, ect.
If you go to highly respected professional reviewing places, you will never see an advertisment that they are recieving for anything they are reviewing. how can you trust a review when you know that, that person/company is getting thousands of dollars from that company.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
