Soleron on 21 November 2009
Kasz216 said:
Here is the problem. If the UEA falsfied data... why wasn't this pointed out in peer review? Even if the UEA didn't release it's data, other cliamte scientists should be able to know when it's data doesn't match with theirs and mention that it's off as such. In another form of science, manipulated data would likely not make it through most journals even withholding data. |
There should be an independent external review, by the journal it was published in, and when that reports we can start judging them. At the moment there it isn't clear how big the problem is, and a lot can be taken out of context. Not defending them if it was a genuine cover-up.
