By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CaseyDDR on 20 November 2009
Edit Thread
Soleron said:
CaseyDDR said:
...

GPUs are starting to be bottle necked heavily by lower end processors recently. The only processors to NOT bottleneck the top of the line cards, and those coming out after are the i7's. 

Bottlenecked, yes. But at over 100fps in most cases. There would be no visible benefit to buying a faster CPU and watching it rise to 150fps.

Other than Crysis, is there any game that is made unacceptably slow by the CPUs I just mentioned at 1920x1200 or below?

People with high end cards and top end PCs tend to run bigger than 1920x1200, therefore yes there are PLENTY of games that push the limits when it comes to 2560x1600 (I think that's the next step).  A lot of games even push 1920x1200, I don't think you're realizing how much bigger than is than the 'typical' resolution ppl use of 1280x1024 or 1024x768.

 

Have you actually ever tried to run games larger than 1920x1200 or 1080p? it causes a massive strain on even higher end cards. 



The Halo francise is the most overrated bland game to ever hit the console market. It provides a bad name to all FPS that even showed effort at creating an original entertaining plot.

I probably have more ps3 games than you :/