hsrob said:
No need to be facetious my friend but do some reading before you dis CRTs HD CRT's had easily better picture quality than the LCD's/plasmas of 2003/4, i.e. a better representation of HD which you claim is so important. Yet they were outsold, why? Because the form factor of LCD's/plasmas is much better; they are much more stylish looking, they take up a lost less space and yet you can get screen sizes significantly above 90cm, which was pretty much the limit of CRTs. My point is not that people would now choose HD CRT TVs, it's that at a time when the option existed, people choose plasma and LCDs but picture quality obviously wasn't the deciding factor.
|
CRT looks better than LCD/Plama when it comes to smaller size screen but CRT doesn't look so well after they get so big. They lose sharpeness on the sides as the beam in the tube has to bend more. (4:3 is more ideal for CRT than 16:9) With LCD/Plamas you can get 42" , 52", etc. with a lot sharper picture.