outlawauron said:
jarrod said:
almcchesney said:
and graphics is objective, either its better or not, |
Not true, visuals are also subjective (Okami PS2 vs Wii for example). Even when supposedly "improved" (SMB1/2/3 vs All-Stars for example). Someone could legitimately prefer the visuals in GOW1/2 PS2 vs the Collection, and can't be faulted for that (though they can be argued against with another subjective view, similar to analog vs pointer controls).
Objective measure in graphics is limited solely to technical aspects (and this can apply to controls too, pointer is technically faster and more accurate than analog), and game reviews tend not to measure that but the sum visual result (which is again, inherently subjective).
|
Art style is subjective, but things like technical graphics, frame rate, screen tearing, etc. are completely objective.
|
That's... uh, pretty much what I said. But game reviews tend not to be technical dissections (at least not the good ones), they're really reviewing the end result. From an art perspective, it's also possible to prefer the PS2 originals over the Collection. Just as it's possible to prefer the slower, less accurate, less direct controls in the GameCube Primes to the Trilogy versions.
