Kasz216 said:
Reasonable said:
Kasz216 said:
Reasonable said:
Yikes! 60% seems awfully, awfully high. |
So does 16%....
Hell even 6% is high for nintendo.
Totally a biased study.
|
Well, yeah, 360 rate remains high by comparison, but 60% has to be way too high surely? I figure that, as often happens, the survey attracted more responses from those who've suffered a failure (after all, it's more tempting if you see the survey to say 'me too' than 'not me') and hence skewed high, I suspect the 360 skewed the highest followed by PS3 with Wii of course coming out the most reliable.
|
Oh yeah. Couldn't agree more... wonder if it's exagerrated via ratio, or just all over the map.
The actual ratios don't seem like they'd be far too off.
360 being 3-4 more times likely to break then a PS3 which is 2-3 times more likely to break then Wii.
Probably just all over the map though.
My PS3 and Wii are often on 8-9 hours a day and neither has failed.
Neither has my 360 but it's had much less of a workload, more likely to use it for short bursts of gaming.
|
I suspect:
1 - the order is correct (D'Huh obviously)
2 - the ratios between consoles are probably not too far out
3 - the percentages are too high, particularly for 360
