well dont' care about reviews, or who is rated higher or not. I gave up on reviewers these days so I assume I will be angry if i pay attention anyway.
But lets compare them.
1. Neither added any extra levels/story or whatever you want to say, they are the same games, thus ports.
GOW:
now in 1080p
added trophy's
2 games on 1 disk
more screen (like widescreen movie compared to sd movie)
Metroid trilogy:
improved graphics, lighting and loading times (for 1 & 2 at least)
added achievements
3 games on 1 disk
1 & 2 improved ot widescreen (thus same more screen as GOW games did)
1 & 2 now have Wii controls
well here is a video of god of war comparison of old game and new http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpMTtJZfhQU&feature=player_embedded well to me it looks like just basically less fuzzy, but youtube so whatever not gonna comment on how much better quality or not. But as for widescreen it looks like fake widescreen. To me it looks like they just cut some of the top bottom off to make widescreen. there isn't more stuff on teh sides.
But ok let me get this straight then GOW fans. Your collection is better because what, its in 1080p? Oh and same controls. Otherwise both have same story, both added achivements/trophies, both less load times or none, both widescreen. Now the Wii is 3 games in 1 versus only 2 in 1. and it has the updated controls.
Face it, Metroid is a better package and bang for your dollar, you just prefer god of war because you like taht series more, or you are just being a biased ass. If you were a reviewer though there is no reason that metroid should not get higher rated.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
