| WheelStriker said: What was wrong with killzone 2 compared to other successful first person shooters? Please no short comments like "story sucks", "halo is better" or any of sorts. |
What do you mean wrong? It did what it was supposed to do, and is one of the best FPS's for the PS3. The controls are a preference thing, but beyond that, it is good. It has bots to. If one is expecting it to be a Halo Killer, they are going to be disappointed. As far as being a Modern Warfare (Call of Duty) killer, it isn't multiplatform.
What was "wrong" with Killzone 2 is the hype behind it, that somehow it was supposed to be a game changer. When you make something out to be a game changer, and it isn't, then you are aksing for problems.
However, you want some nits, here are a few:
1. No split-screen multiplayer (did they add this?).
2. Helghan is not a pretty place, and doesn't have much in variety as far as environment goes.
3. As mentioned above, lack of auto-aim assist.
