Mudface on 16 November 2009
| richardhutnik said: I wouldn't end up labelling it as a boycott. I would say it is a person tired of being nickled and dimed deciding they don't want any part of it. |
Tomayto, tomato.
I really can't see how refusing to buy a game because you have to pay for online multiplayer is any different to refusing to buy a game that costs $10 more and has less features than its predecessor.
Maybe if console owners made a stand and supported these sort of actions, instead of lapping up whatever publishers throw at them and criticisng what are basically pissed off customers, we wouldn't be in the situation where the biggest games company in the world wants you to pay to play.
