SHOWDOWN. Modern Warfare 2 vs. Killzone 2. GRAPHICS

[Serious_frusting]

numonex said:

The graphics comparison in the OP clearly shows Killzone 2 has much better graphics than Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 when comparing similar screenshots. Screenshots can be doctored. Are the screenshots in the same resolution/settings? Could it be HD Killzone 2 screen shots versus SD Modern Warfare 2 screen shots?

Killzone 2 is a very good game. I was impressed with it: Alt 2 controls FTW. Campaign a bit too short, ended very abruptly. Killzone 2 has better graphics than Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 according to widespread opinion on these game forums.
I have not played COD: MW2 yet but it apparently has a very short campaign in it as well.

A PS3 exclusive game is expected to have better graphics than a multi-platform game. 4 years from first announcement to start and finish Killzone 2. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 start to finish less than 18 months.

So true.

@ Kresh

You do realise that COD MW2 frames per second are very inconsistent and very rarly ever reach 60? i think it like averages 45 or something. Thats the 360 version. the PS3 version is like 40 i think but dont take it as fact because its been like two days since i read it.

I am sure KZ2 would be able to reach the same FPS had it been 600p instead 720p. Just because the mood in KZ2 is dark and depressing it makes it unrealistic?

Helgan isnt suppsoed to be like earth. More like a mars kind of place. And have you seen the daytime seens in KZ2 by the way?

 

Just asking thats all