It is true that they are not his words but he posted the article and supported the dubious assumption made by bloomberg and then started to gloat about poor sony sales.
Let's have a look at one section of the article again shall we and I quote "
Bloomberg.com found out from Sony Computer Entertainment corporate spokesperson Kimberly Otzman that the 100,000 actually was inclusive of all PlayStation consoles, which we would assume means PS2 and PSP as well – not so impressive."
Ok now I would seperate the first part of the paragraph which states that the spokesperson says that the 100.000 includes all playstation consoles and the second part where bloomberg makes the assumption which fishy supported.
The point I have been trying to make all this time is that at no point did the spokesperson specify if that figure included the handheld sales.
