ironman said:
|
There's really no point in arguing with you over things, because you seriously fail to see fact or reason. True, we may live in a disposable
generation, but that does not extend to all aspects of life. Especially costly electronics. And since the the final standard profile for Blu-ray players makes it mandatory to have internet access, updating is easier than before. But I will admit much older customers won't, but they probably won't really care for the added benefits the upgrade brings.
I find it funny that you continuously speak as if we live in a technologically "stupid" world, yet you see that DLC will win out over Blu-ray. If people are so confused by tech, DLC has no chance in hell to succeed. It's so much simplier to stick in a Blu-ray into a player than it is to set up a machine to DL movies from the internet. I mean what happens when the program they use to download movies needs updating to use? They'll just say screw it and buy a new one? Highly doubt it. We live in a more technologically minded world than you think. And you better thank God for that if you want DLC to win out over Blu-ray.
Sorry but people weren't popping records into their cars in the 60's and 70's. Even if you still don't want to go with the true events of that time, a time you yourself admit to have no experience in, you still can't claim that 8-track was a flop. Even using your history, they had competition of LP's and cassettes, and 8-tracks still stuck around for almost 2 decades since it's launch (nearly 3 if you count radio stations using them). No matter how you wish to reinvision history, it won't change it for historians or those who lived in that time period. So just do yourself a favor. Be humble and admit you were wrong. 8-tracks weren't a dismal failure. Hell you can even throw in that Blu-ray isn't, but I won't force you.
LOL. Blu-ray is expensive? And how much do you think DVD cost in it's first years? Believe it or not, the prices were pretty much the same. In fact a lot of DVD players were over $1,000 when they came out. All electronics are like this. It's so funny how people forget this so fast, just because it helps their argument. The fact is Blu-ray has dropped significantly since launch. In fact some movies sell at $10, granted the movies are a little older. And a lot of new movies are $25, only $5 more than brand new DVD's.
You misunderstood me. I was saying that people can keep their old movies. But when a NEW movie is released, they can choose to buy either DVD or Blu-ray. That's why Blu-ray will be successful. Your old movies will not become obsolete, as VHS did when DVD came out. And please don't try and say that's pointless because VHS was a failure. It would only make you seem more ignorant.
The Wal-mart I go to is a Super Wal-mart with a pretty big electronics department (I also go to a regular Wal-mart closer to me, but it's the same situation). All I know is they had maybe 1 DVD/VHS combo, 1 upconverting DVD player, and like 6 Blu-ray players. More stores are going to be like this in the next few months, if they haven't already. Especially as DVD sales fall, and Blu-ray continues to rise. And until I see any sales numbers for upconverting DVD players, I'm going to have to assume they are not in high demand. Otherwise there would be more of them on shelves than Blu-ray players.