scottie said:
The NYTimes producing reviews makes it acceptable for all the other reviewers to be immature? Cool... So because I see reviews asa guide to whether people should buy games, as opposed to an analysis of their objective quality, I am ignoring the reason why they are there?
'we'? don't you lump me in with you. It's time for you to put up or shut up, search through every one of my 4000 posts (or will this be 3999?) and find one single time, in which I praised IGN after they gave a good review to a game I like. Actually, that's a waste of time, I know there isn't one. Lets broaden the parameters, if you can find one single time in which I praised any game reviewer after they gave a good score to a game I like, and at another date, insult that same review source. Note, don't get all excited when you find that I praise Famitsu, Penny Arcade, Vgchartz and zero punctuation reviews, because you will not find a time when I refer to them as bad reviewers |
I don't need to search.
you think FAMITSU is good at reviews ? lol
Zero Punctuation is as reliable as The Onion
VGCHARTZ is new and sometimes very harsh when scoring.
IGN is still the most respected site when it comes to reviews, their score means more than any other site I can think of, you just don't like them because they have given certain games you like low score, that's all.
We are done talking.
Next Gen
| 11/20/09 04:25 | makingmusic476 | Warning | Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.) |







