By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik on 13 November 2009
Edit Thread
BladeOfGod said:
Scoobes said:
BladeOfGod said:
Lots of PC gamers are very arrogant. They like to think themselfes like ''Elite Gamers''. Console port is not good enough for them.
Sure, they torrent every COD game like hell, but that doesnt stop them from bitching how IW doesnt care about them

That's a very ignorant comment. It's not simply that a console port isn't good enough (many games on PC are direct ports of the console game), its that features have been removed that have been standard in PC games for many years. It would be like Bungie releasing a Halo game with only local multiplayer and no online, and not all PC gamers are pirates. Piracy on PC is a problem (more than on consoles sure) but that sort of sweeping generalisation is just plain false.

rating a game 1.4????? Seriously????? They are actually trying to tell people the game is worse than Big Rigs???? They are obviously just hating on IW. I understand they removed some features but rating a game 1.4???? 1.4 means almost un-playable

There appears to be some sort of cult forming around this phenomenon trying to rationalize why that is correct.  In some universe, the fact that Big Rigs is an epic failure means that it is justified having a greater rating than the PC version of MW2.  As I see it, that is some sort of warped reasoning that totally trashes rating systems.  I am sorry, if a game sucks more, it should have a lower rating.  And, if you want to totally trash MW2 for the PC, rate it a 5.  A 5 is totally forgettable.  Being less than 2 isn't.  Less that 2 makes a game totally memorable for how bad it is.