Adjudicator said:
twesterm said:
tedsteriscool said: Next time you complain about something free, ask yourself: "Does the competition even offer this?" |
Does it really matter if what they are offering isn't good?
In a perfect world where everything is good and works perfectly then yes, very valid question, but things don't always work perfectly. In the PS3 browsers case, it's far from perfect. Yes, it's there and it's better than what MS offers since they don't have one at all, but it's still a joke.
The little I have used it, it crashed a lot and was horribly slow. In the time it takes for me to turn on my PS3, open the browser, browse to my desired page (even assuming I have bookmarked and don't have to type it in with the controller), and then actually view it assuming I haven't crashed I could have viewed 10 pages on my laptop (and even watch TV at the same time!).
Yes, I get it's free and they don't have to offer it, but that still doesn't excuse it from criticism.
|
Well it shouldn't excuse it, but cut it a lil slack maybe?
|
What do you mean cut it slack? Like should I count it as a negative against the PS3? Yeah, it should not be held against the PS3, I'll cut it slack there because it is free and it is not required.
But the OP asked a question and people are answering. Would you rather I blow smoke up your ass? I can pretend to love it or even say just say meh, it mostly works but is there really any use in that?