By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik on 11 November 2009
Edit Thread
IllegalPaladin said:
richardhutnik said:
IllegalPaladin said:
Mudface said:
Jesus, who gives a fuck about Metacritic scores? Aside from the management at games publishers, of course.

Well, seeing that this thread was created and seeing the usual banter about a game's metacritic score being A, AA, or AAA and such.

 

:P

I have seen arguing about MW2's graphics being 10 or not being 10 (to say high 8s) to the game justifiably being considered on par with Big Rigs in this thread (and the post I put up).  In all this, all I see is a lot of fanboy anger that is worth less than a patch on Big Rigs to make it tolerable.

So then from the looks of it, you're still taking this crap way too seriously. I've already made my post on how I disagree with the changes made to the PC version and did it reasonably. I think you should take a step back since it feels like you're taking these scores as truth. You even said yourself that it's the crazy fanboys, so why should you have to look into it anymore past that?

Why?  Because I hold up Big Rigs as a benchmark of AWFUL, and I don't like anything that doesn't approach its level of awful threatening it.  That is why.   One has to appreciate the level of awfulness in Big Rigs to know why I am offended.  It starts with the website of the publisher of the game, and them writing stuff about how cheap coders+brilliant management=winning combination.