coolbeans said:
Simply amazing is all I have to say to that last sentence......... They weren't twice as much but they were overestimated for sure THEN AGAIN as I stated earlier there could've been an accounting for the live streamed audience for those who may have not been able to make the march to washington. Then again I don't recall him ever using X numbers in Washington and Y numbers through live streamed audience so fudging the numbers happened to a certain extent. The first ones to have mislabeled them not being grassroots but as "astroturf" came from Nancy Pelosi.............lol need I say more. Glenn Beck has already stated this I'm figuring the facts to the best of your understanding are a bit miscontrued, hopefully I could help but perhaps your level of care could also come into question as well.
|
Glenn beck said that "I went to get some numbers checked professionally and according to the university of..i don't know, there was 1.7m people there"
The very highest estimates are 2m, the minimum is 70k, and most commonly the estimate according to other professionals was 800k. Additionally, there was another rally there that day of some 40-70k people.
And that refutes the point? Don't understand that logic, but ok. Guess you wouldn't care anyway.
Yeah, after critics came down on him. I can't find the EP where he talks about it for the first time.










