richardhutnik on 11 November 2009
| justinian said: Jesus.. The X360 camp will always try to build up a x360 game that can compete with K2. So desperate are they that even a multiplat will do. Lol. On the opposing PS3 side vice versa. The whole scenario is one of x360 fans pleading for their console to be equal graphically to the PS3 and PS3 fans saying "no, it is not..at least not yet" Most of you were the same bunch claiming Gears2 > K2. Now Gears2 is forgotten - for most. MW2 now greater than Gears2 it seems. I believe the x360 has more to offer but MW2 is not it. @Selnor Dude you are all over the shop. First ign was your reviewing God until someone posted ign's scores that reflect U2 and K2 > MW2 graphically. When that blew your argument wide open you jumped on some other review site ... (I can't even remember the name).. to carry on your constant graphics war chip on your shoulder business...I've read through your previous post. If 60fps = best graphics ever then the latest R&C is right next to MW2. |
What I had seen for MONTHS is how Killzone 2 was going to be a game changer, and possibly supplant Halo. Not as bad as "Halo Killer" but out there for the most part. Go look up the insane buzz on here about that. As for forgotten, Killzone 2 is in the forgotten category. No one makes mention of it as being a game changer, meaning more sales for the PS3. It didn't cause console FPS fans to go and buy a PS3 instead of a 360.
