Modern Warfe 2 Graphics. Give it a rest. It's awesome.

[richardhutnik]

BMaker11 said:

I can see "AGGH PS3 fans are the ones who think that KZ2 looks better" (even though it does). But check this out. Why is it only the devout 360 fans, who for the longest time have been looking for a game to topple KZ2 the only ones who think MW2 looks better? Look at the "middle ground" people, PS3 fans, multiconsole owners, and they all agree MW2 doesn't look as good as KZ2.

For reminders, GTAIV got a 10 in graphics and that KZ2 scored lower AFTERWARDS. Seriously? What if IGN scored the graphics lower for MW2? Would you still be on your high horse, or just because a number has been attached to it, you're going to gloat?

Well guess what, as someone already pointed out, IGN has 3 different scores for MW2 in graphics: 10, 9.5, and 9.0. KZ2? 10, 10, and 9.5. Add those up and see which number is higher. Nobody ever said that MW2 is a poor graphics game, just that it's not up there with KZ2. YOU give it a rest

Consideriing the environment KZ2 is rendering, it does a GREAT job.  It is 30 FPS, but still does a great job.  In the case of MW2, it is operating at 60FPS, and needs to render more diverse environments.  I am finding the hairsplitting here ABSURD.  Each game is trying to do different things, the same way Uncharted 2 is doing different things, and Forza and GT are trying to.  And then you have Borderlands, which is different.

So, does it matter if MW2 is 10 great on graphics or as low as the high 8s?  Do the graphics work for the game?  I would argue they do.  Other than, what else matters?  Do people SERIOUSLY think ranting on here, and preaching to the choir is going to matter all that much?  ONLY time just about I would want to see here matter, is to cause a game like VC to suddenly gett attention and sales, and warrent a sequel.  Or, to end up warning the masses of garbage stuff.  MW2, KZ2, and Among Thieves are NOT garbage, and are top of their respective classes for games.  Can we just leave it at that?