FKNetwork said:
SpartanFX said:
FKNetwork said:
b0ub0u said:
LOL I can't believe I am reading 7 pages of people comparing the graphics between games.. and not once anyone said anything about the framerate.
Guys... you have to realize that this game run at a constant 60 fps... Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 both run at 30 fps. So COD is the clear winner here. BY FAR. I just cannot play a first person shooter at 30 fps. It manage to have all those details.. and still run at a contant 60 fps... this is truly a great accomplishment from Infinity Ward. I wish more companies would do the same. But no... because the most majority of people don't give a damn about framerate. They are satisfied with their below 30 fps GTA IV. LOL. There is no reason for a game to be bellow 60 fps. Anyway it is clear that some people do not see the difference...
And don't call me a fanboy because I won't even be buying Modern Warfare 2, as I only play first person shooters on my PC. I may get it on PC eventually.
|
^this
The game is a masterpiece, the graphics are by far the best this generation on console, it runs at 60FPS with all that detail, KZ2 and Unchartered 2 run at 30FPS, so yes, MW2 is far better hence why reviewers are calling MW2 the new benchmark.
|
don't get too excited,,,,it's not.when i see those low res, pixaletd textures everywhere, it can not be called graphics king or what ever.you want awesome graphics play uncharted 2,,,,even killzone 2 kills MW2,,,,,i don't care what frame rate it runs when i m playing the game.no screen tearing and very smooth in both KZ2 and U2.
|
LOL, I've played them all and stick to what I said:
The game is a masterpiece, the graphics are by far the best this generation on console, it runs at 60FPS with all that detail, KZ2 and Unchartered 2 run at 30FPS, so yes, MW2 is far better hence why reviewers are calling MW2 the new benchmark.
60FPS ------> 30FPS any day
|
