| thismeintiel said: So ironman, are you saying that Blu-ray can only hold 2 layers for 50 GB? Or maybe your speaking of the 4 layers that Hitachi used to get 100 GB or 6 layers to get 200GB? Ritek used 10 layers to get 250GB out of a disc. Pioneer used 16 layers to push 400GB out of one disc, and are currently working on a 1TB disc they hope to get out by 2013. YES! The commercial version of bluray will NEVER be over two layers. All the others that you speak of were prototypes and require a different drive to run. Yes, but due to the laser config they cannot expand bluray. You need a new drive to use any of those configs. so yeah, you COULD put more than two layers on a bluray disc, but it would be impractical. And as for the fanboy comment, seriously, why do I look like and "ignorant fanboy" ? I guess using logic and reason qualifies me as such? And as for "having educated people own me" I haven't seen any of that happen in this thread yet...but nice try, you only insult yourself by saying things like that. 8 track was a dismal falure, what are you smoking. 8 tracks were never very popular, they had a short boon, and then were subsequently replaced by tapes. No it won't do away with physical media, but then, I never said that it would. It will, however, greatly reduce the sales of physical media after a few years. Already DVDs and Bluray sales are diminishing due to it. Oh, and the CD comment is utter fail, Digital distribution was not around on a large scale until well after 1997 |








