"The problem is you don't care about actually listening to someone else's opinoin... you just want to take any opportunity to point out someone else's misspelling or mistakes. I bring up a question, and instead of discussion, there are personal attacks."
Apparently neither do you.
You originally asked if we could imagine if most games were Bay type games and he basically answered yes he could because today's games are mostly bay type games.
He did give you discussion fodder but instead of arguing how most of the current crop of game is of Scorsese caliber as opposed to it being Bay caliber (which seems to be your point) you seem to argue that by saying "Michael Bay" you didn't mean graphic as you don't care about them, thus avoiding his contention that current games are mostly Michael Bay, Freddie Prince jr, Wayne Bros... movies.
You then end your post with some passive aggressive behavior.
So instead of becoming aggressive why don't you take a deep breath and explain to us why you think that today's games are more Scorsese like that Bay/... like. After all, you might like System Shock 2 but there probably is less than 1 game in 30 that are as deep so you liking it does not add weight to your argument that most games are scorsese like today.
"I do not suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it"
