| theman88 said: Lately people have been posting comparison on lens of truth. And to say the least they have been wrong almost everytime. I dont want to start a war and say they are biased to Xbox 360 because i dont think that is the case. But in the Borderlands comparison they said that Xbox had better screenshots, to which I and immediately CGI quality said they were full of shit. Also somehow they argued that Tekken 6 was better on the 360. And now they have MW2 significantly better on the 360, which i will admit it probably is but not by the margins they say it is. This is confirmed by CGI that they are very close in graphic comparison. So does anyone else think that LENS OF TRUTH is a lens of bullshit?
Discuss! |
Obviously you did not READ the LOT article and just looked at the screens shots. Right at the top of the article they say..
“…the real decision comes down to which version your friends are getting.”
“It is our job to report the differences, no matter how small, present the data and determine a victor.”
So what were the small differences?
- 360 has glare/bloom, PS3 does not
- 360 has softer dynamic shadows
- 360 has a higher FPS
- Load times are better on 360
Again, READ the article it clearly stated in the article the outcome.
"The win was marginal with slightly better visuals, quicker loading times and a higher average fps on the Xbox 360. As stated before, you will not be disappointed with either version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2."
Case Closed, move on and enjoy MW2 on either system
