selnor said:
What the hell? Hold on. The whole KZ2 thing started and the reason for this thread, was because Fans ( Only Sony ones ) didnt like the fact that review sites were giving MW2 a higher rating than KZ2 in graphics. I have said of many games I expect to beat KZ2 visually but many arent out yet. MW2 was an unexpected one, but nonetheless a great achievement. So actually it was Sony fans who started it. With the no way IGN 10 for graphics BS talk. But little do they realsie IGN is like the 10th reviewer to think that. LOL. I posted some other thoughts here already. But there is 31 reviews of MW2. You should read some of them. It's not just IGN. Unless a game is exclusive Some Sony fans dont ever count it in their top 5 grpahics, because it means the 360 is doing it also. It's sad. Games which I believe will beat KZ2 are also Lost Planet 2, Assasins Creed 2 and they are both 3rd party to. But 90% of PS3 only fabs will never put a 3rd party game in that sort of respect. It's not about being happy or not happy, it's about giving credit. |
while your right about this thread...im tlaking baout the bigger picture...as in like the other guy said ,there alway seems to be a need for some multiplat /xbox360 game to beat killzone 2...the whole thing about rage,crysis...all that.yes mw2 looks good,but better than killzone 2? no i dont htink so...and yeah i know your gonna say "but thats because mw2 is multplat"...i thought mw1 was very good looking and better than mgs4 but i cant speak for the rest of the ps3 owners.

"They will know heghan belongs to the helghast"
"England expects that everyman will do his duty"
"we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender"








