Interesting.
Knowing how super religious people debate they probably hit all the wrong points.
They probably didn't even try to clear up a lot of myths that people hold about the older catholic church and ignored a lot of the good said church did in preserving knowledge and in general being the only big bankers of science for a pretty long time through history.
Or is this just currently?
Not that I think they'd even win historically... but they have a much better argument historically even with that being when the church was more corrupt.
I'd be surprised if they even hit the charity work they currently do... whatever it is.








