Kasz216 on 09 November 2009
| Rath said: It means that their economic policy was never fully defined. Unlike the Italian fascists the Nazi's never really said what they were going to do with their economy. Their economy also shifted markedly over the years they were in power depending on the political climate. As such it's not really possible to find an economic model which matches that of Nazi Germany because Nazi Germany didn't really have one. I don't really understand what you're asking for, the economies I gave you as examples range between partially socialised (ie. government run schools, healthcare etc.) to the much more socialised (government runs much of the businesses and production). What are you looking for? |
What the people in the poll are looking for. Something New.
I'm talking about the people who say "It is fatally flawed a new system is needed."
The Chinese and Venzulian economies don't really match that.
Additionally... it should be noted that China was hit a lot harder by the economic crisis then they let on. It's just easier for them to "hide" their numbers.
The truth... the real truth is... no matter how far you go down the street on that... nothing is going to save you from economic downturns... even protectionism like the chinese way.
That is unless you intentionally slow economic growth. Which i think people would end up liking even less.
