BHR-3 said: absolutely sick of multis looking better on the box just sick of it
why is this happening?
this happen last gen with ps2 vs box and the 1st box usually had the better lookin multis
also ps1 vs 64 again any ports from ps1 to 64 not many but the 64 s looked better
then this gen sony releases there ps3 a year later ud think games would run/look better than the box but no thats not the case it really is upsetting me
Im absolutely sick of people who believe that the PS3 has an absolute advantage in everything rather than a comparative advantage in certain areas. This game was developed seperately for both the PS3 and Xbox 360 so there is no lesser console in this equation. Well guess what? The Xbox 360 also has a comparative advantage in certain areas as well.
That MSAA = Free, the PS3 pays for it in frame time.
The box has massive bandwidth for those heavy alpha scenes.
The box can deliver more consistant framerates because the work flow on it is much simpler. It doesn't matter if the PS3 can render the game in 10ms vs 14ms for the Xbox 360 if the PS3 spikes to 16ms on certain areas like with heavy alpha blend. You're only as good as your weakest frame time.
never really said that the ps3 as an advantage in anything ever on this site
all im saying is that i kinda accepted all this wen 64 and GC,box1 had the multis look and run better b/c the ps1 and ps2 came out b4 the all competition and now with there ps3 coming out later than the 360 and costing way more u would think it would be the playstations turn to have the multis run/look better
watever the case may be HW issues with the ps3 or lazy devs or watever, however i believe its the PS3 HW thats causing all these multis to not run/look as good as the box's sony needs to set up to the plate next gen
b/c mw2 isnt the only game that runs/looks better on the box there are far more games where the box has the clear advantaged and some unlike this MW2 comparison where there not to much of a diffrence graphicly there are other games where thers just no comparison on which one looks better
You should know better. The difference between the games is so minisule, that even in cherry picked screens side by side you can barely tell the difference. Rememberwhen they tried to make a huge deal about the differences in Resident Evil 5?
Does that look like a GLARING difference to you? Of course not because they are virtually identical and you should be happy knowing you can play the PS3 versions of this game in addition to PS3's amazing exclusives the differences in quality of which IS truly glaring. Stop falling for this fanboy trap.
