LordTheNightKnight said: Rath said: LordTheNightKnight said: Rath said: MontanaHatchet said: Graphics don't matter as long as they're held up to a certain standard.
Unless some of you would be fine with us playing in 2D. |
I'm fine with 2D>3D for some games. For example I prefer tile based rougelikes to 3D hack'n'slash in general. For example I like Castle of the Winds more than Diablo. For some games 3D is plainly better though, for example shooters. |
Diablo isn't 3D. It's 2D in an ismetric perspective. Diablo 2 is also isometric 2D. Some Diablo clones are 3D, though. |
I thought Diablo was 2.5D at least? In that it creates the impression of three dimensions? Ahh well, Dungeon Siege then. |
2.5D is 2D gameplay with 3D graphics, like Contra on the PS2. |
Just looked up D2 on wikipedia, found this quote.
"Battle is conducted in real-time, using an isometric oblique top-down viewpoint (basically, this just means that the game has a set, hovering camera angle, a viewpoint often called "2.5D" because it is between 2D and 3D)"
Of course Wikipedia is a pile of donkey feces so...