| Soonerman said: I'm not gonna lie. I'm not fan of this new rule that states that you cannot call a game exclusive just because it is only available to one specific console and PC. Personally to me that's all perception and definitely a stretching rule that kind of shows that moderation is getting far out of hand and going the same way of that other forum that bans any VGChartz talk. But anyway, I'll stop my rant on that and focus on another issue here: Since that's a bannable offense I believe that it should be also bannable to claim that X console is winning the format war even tho Y really is but Y console shouldn't count because it is NOT an HD console. Yes, we're talking about the Wii. If people can claim PS3 is kicking ass this generation because its beating all HD consoles is pretty dumb. Wii plays videogames just like Xbox 360 and PS3 so by default there should be no different between the 3 consoles when it comes to claiming winning status. Rant off. Discuss |
this is completely out of focus.
That thread simply provided a definition.
If you read it again, you would see that there are two terms listed.
One is "console exclusive"-only on one console and pc
the other is "exclusive"- only a one platform, no pc
The whole point was to combat people saying "those games aren't exclusive" to exclusive games lists. Of course, the OP will have to write "this is a list of console exclusives for 20**"
