madskillz said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
madskillz said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
nightsurge said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
nightsurge said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
If they wanted so much marketshare,and so many sales like youre saying,why didnt they put the launch price 300$ and gameover?Why drop the price 100$ a year because the production cost got lower,when they could have done that? |
Because they would have lost so much per console they'd have literally gone bankrupt at that point. They would have lost like $800 per console... It would have definitely been game over, though... for Sony 
They are still losing money per console sold. Accept this as it is a fact. I'm sorry, bud.
|
You think they are stupid?
|
Yes, they have been very stupid and arrogant this generation.
|
They introduced Blu-Ray,which is the future of gaming,but they introduced it at a risk,calling them stupid without knowing their true intention is rather silly.They won the BluRay-HD DVD war,and now they are starting making profit from the Ps 3 aswell.
Everything u will say will only be biased.
|
Link for this or it didn't happen.
|
http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/104/1040692p1.html
|
I don't think Engrish is your first language. If it is, you have failed.
Did you read the article you posted? It clearly states - Sony is HOPING to make a profit.
You know, I want to be a billionaire, and one day, I will. So, with that said, I am hoping to be a billionaire. I guess I am starting to be a billionaire, one dollar at a time.
BTW, for the folks too lazy to hit the link, here's the hed:
Sony Eyes PS3 Profitability
System may stop losing money next year.
I just have one thing to say:
U have been ...
|
Its about the numbers in the article,about how the losses are going lower and lower,thats what i meant,next time you should read the full article carefully and think about it m8.
Posting pics like that is not pretty smart aswell
