euclid said: I am sure someone else said this but here it is again: You are worried about the number of games and immediately assume they are going to be crappy by the amount of them being released in such a short time frame. When has nintendo EVER rushed games... Look at how they are handling metriod prime 3 and super smash brothers. These games could probably be released right now, but they aren't because they are not PERFECT. Nintendo doesn't rush games. (anyone remember waiting for ocarina of time???) This is straight from wiki, its in Shigeru Miyamoto's article: "A delayed game is eventually good; a bad game is bad forever"It's not rare for Nintendo to delay its games. This is largely due to the perfectionist tendency of Miyamoto who would go as far as scrapping the entire development if he did not find a game up to his standard. Miyamoto and fellow developers refer to this scrapping as "Chabudai Gaeshi" (ちゃぶ台返し, "upending the tea table"), a reference to manga and anime Hoshi of the Giants.[4] It is also referred to as "Miyahon Check" (Miyahon is an alternative kanji reading of Miyamoto) or "Miyamoto Test".[1]
Also, you arguments about losing the ability to play the kinda games you like (hardcore for a lack of a better word) is silly. Developers will still make those kinda games if they sell. You hardcore gamers aren't going anywhere because casuals are being brought in, are ya? |
I just wanna point out that... Every game you mention there besides twilight princess... is almost 10 years old.
Not trying to discredit you, I'm just saying... That's a long time ago, and alot changes. When was the last major nintendo game that had a 2-3 year delay? OOT? that's 10 years ago. TP was delayed... not because it needed more work, they wanted to use it as a launch game on the Wii.
PSN ID: Kwaad
I fly this flag in victory!