By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Steroid said:
Squilliam said:
Steroid said:
madskillz said:

Please tell me this - and you claim to be a 360 *owner* - why does MS have to drop the price of the Arcade to $99? They aren't losing money on the 360 - they posted a profit while Sony is losing money on every console sold. And MS is desperate? They were last gen when they kept cutting prices to match the PS2.

This time? Sony is the one rushing the Slim, cutting prices to within striking distance of the 360. Of course it would sell - but the big question that is way too premature to answer is - will it keep selling at this pace.

Sony has been desperate this entire gen. They showed how desperate they were when the discontinued two skus in less than a year after launch, dropped the price to $499 - and then $399 and now $299. The Arcade/Core 360 was $299 at launch - the Premium was $399. In the 4 years it's been on the market, the Core dropped just $100. Think about it - the Core never had a hard drive - and neither has the Arcade. The Elite was $499 - and has dropped $200 - but no where as fast as the PS3.

I'm not talking about 2006 or 2007 or PS2, PS1 or SNES. I'm talking about 2009 and how any time the PS3 and 360 have had a comperable price point the PS3 has outsold the 360 in any and every region. Also I never said Microsoft was deseperate but if they dropped the arcade to the same price as as a PS2- cheaper then a DS or a PSP even- yes that would be an act of desperation. At what point does Microsoft consider this option?

If PS3 closes the gap, after the 360 had a year headstart, after they made all that effort to gather all those games that made a PS2 a success, after spending all that money on advertising ($40,000,000 marketing for Halo 3 alone), after being $100 or more cheaper for the majority of it's lifetime then yes absolutely yes that would be a humiliating defeat for MS. 

Profit: 1. Wii 2 Xbox 360 3 PS3

Level of humiliation: 1. Sony 2. Microsoft 3 Nintendo

 

Wat? MS is still 7-9 billion in the hole for the X-Box brand. Not exactly somthing to brag about. At least PS3 helped Sony win a format war. Now with Apples instal base growing Google dominating search engines and Internet Exlorer losing its grip as the #1 web browser losing this console battle is sefinately not what MS needs right now.


Sony going from 1st place last gen the LAST place this gen.................. now THATS impressive.

We all know how sony got to the top in this business.......................... MONEY............. they had NOTHING to begin with in the gaming world, they BOUGHT their success during the ps1 days by moneyhatting 3rd party companies (Square, namco, konmai, you name it)............... they continued their moneyhatting ways during the ps2 days but BOUGHT a few development studios on a 2nd party basis, NOW, finally after 15 years they finally have some development teams that they can call their own.

You think that microsofts influence with regards to their internet stronghold is fading? its not fading anywhere near as badly as sonys psp and ps3, after last gen sony were expected to walk this gen, it was supposed to be a cake walk for them.

Oh how the allegedly mighty have fallen.

Sonys wallet as opposed to their actual gaming talent may have helped them win a couple of gens, but theres a new sheriff in town with more money than sony................................... microsoft.