By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kantor said:
elticker said:
Kantor said:
elticker said:
Kantor said:
elticker said:
Kantor said:
elticker said:
Kantor said:
elticker said:
thats why i dont buy acitivision published games or developed games. i never bought a game published or developed by activision and i never will.

They haven't always been an evil, money-grabbing corporation, you know. That only started around three years ago.

lol until they start publishing qaulity games i will keep what i think of. ps isnt MW2 identical to MW in singleplayer and multiplayer.

Are you implying that the early Call of Duties and Tony Hawk games weren't quality?

And no, MW2 is not identical to MW, any more than Uncharted 2 is identical to Uncharted, Gears 2 is identical to Gears, and ANYTHING 2 is related to THE ORIGINAL.

halo reach is tottaly different from halo 3 :P

How do you know that?

Besides, Halo Reach isn't a sequel, it's a spin-off.

All sequels are similar to the original, or they fail at being sequels.


how do i know?

from screen shots and info they have given us. screen shots indicate a new health system perks like camo different weaponary and different story. from info is that its using a new engine built from scratch up :P. ps I never heard of a spinoff that has been in developement for 3 years, spinoffs ussaully dont sell very well so your saying that it will sell alot less than halo 3.

Spinoff isn't the word. But it's not Halo 4. It isn't a sequel to Halo 3.

I suppose if you never buy sequels that are similar to the original, you've never bought some of the best games of all time. Pity.

My favourite game is a sequel, actually (God of War II). My favourite game this gen, Uncharted 2, is also a sequel.

What would you have them do to Modern Warfare 2 to stop it being "the same as" CoD4?

the problem is that there is no improvement that the cod before it. i heard people say the multiplayer felt the same as the one in mw and same goes to single player they do not inovate or improve. all they improve is graphics and fix bugs. take halo reach, fans asked for the old halo 1 life system so they reinvented the life system etc.... and that doesn't stop halo reach from having an epic single player and multiplayer. Improve cod4 not only in graphics. does it improve destruction of buildings etc...... and i think the answer is no or slight improvement.

Tell me:

Did CoD4 have vehicles? shouldn't it be standard by now that they should have vehicles i mean battlefield b company had it and it was released in june 2008, halo 3 has it.

Did it have co-op? i thought they removed it but surely by now you realise that almost all games have coop as standard right hell gears of war 1 had coop and that was in 2006.

Snow levels? what does snow levels add to the game?

Customisable killstreaks? I dont know what that is

MW2 has new perks, with some of the more imbalanced ones removed (so thats basically like a patch, did you know they can disable inapropriate perks via a patch update. that happened in gears of war 2 instead of releasing gears of war 3 and saying they fixed that and that.. I believe the level cap is higher (gears of war 2 also had an update for that instead of releasing a new gears of war and saying we increased the level cap.. The campaign is longer(did you ever hear of DLC, thats what GTAIV did to elongate the story same thing with gears of war 2 and fable 2), the story is better(no comment)...what more do you want? (huge improvements what you mention are slight improvements, or no improvements). so basically they are selling you a patch with some new vehicles and weapons + improved graphics for $59.