Onyxmeth said:
snyperdud said:
Onyxmeth said:
snyperdud said:
Because, to say that that PSN doesn't have a good enough community aspects to fully enjoy a game L4D is just plain stupid.
When a game like KZ2 can provide a great online/community experience that is on par with any online game that I've played on the 360 that proves it right there.
This would be like Naughty Dog saying Uncharted 2 online wouldn't work well on XBL because of the community.
Even though, they haven't even attempted nor have any intentions of attempting.
Seems really stupid to make a comment like that to me.
|
Maybe so, but I was quoting you because I was refering to your comment, not his. If you find it better if I take a stance on the matter, then I think his original comment is wrong, and yours was just as ignorant. The PSN community isn't perfect, but it's good enough to wrap the Left 4 Dead package around, and you obviously don't need to develop a PS3 game to know what the community is like.
|
What part of my comment was ignorant?
I never said PSN was perfect, or that even it was better than XBL.
It's true that Valve doesn't have to develop a game to know what the community is like. However, if you going to make a statement like they did, they should at least show some kind of proof or something to back up their comment.
Because right now, Valve are the ignorant ones.
|
The ignorant part of your comment was the part that said Valve needs to have developed a PS3 game to have knowledge of the PSN community. The fact that you've now said the complete opposite in the bolded shows you understand that your original statement was in no way correct and could have then be portrayed as ignorant.
|
Ok. I admit, I wrong on that.
But that still doesn't justify what Valve said was right though.