I have a hard time caring about this considering it is just a few signs in a sea of signs. Particularly when both sides engage in crazy-bombing opposing protests (ie posing as a lefty/righty with extreme views to soak up media coverage and make the opposing protest look crazy).
What I'm surprised at is that people constantly bring up these no-name/nobody examples like it makes a point. I mean I can simply point out that the lefty PAC LaRouche compares Obama to Hitler as a stated position...it's like a friggin policy for them.
My point with that goes no further than there are extremist willing to make absurd connections on both sides and they come in all forms, both organized and unorganized. Do we really need a thread every time joe random holds up a hitler/holocaust/etc... sign? Does it really make a difference if he is a lefty or a righty, whether or not he supports Obamacare, or really anything else...once the comparison is made isn't the person just simply crazy and nothing more?
It just seems a bit like folks are trying to go to this punching bag way too often.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
