By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:

A) Did you read the exert I posted.  Link again here. Any comparison of absolute GDP healthcare spending is absolutely moronic.

B) You still haven't answered the question.  How do you avoid the fact that larger populations need more levels of staffing then smaller ones?  How does economics of scale fit in, when the government is the one who decides the prices anway?

I dont know of anyone here who doesnt think that culture pays a part in health.  I do know, however, that the cultural differences in health between the United Kingdom and the United States does not account for threefold costs.  Something like this should be simple to understand, just ask a doctor in the United Kingdom how much they make and ask a doctor in the United States how much they make, I'll go ahead and break it to you that its not a one to one ratio.

Economies of scale still works for the government because, even though they can set the price, they are still subject to market forces.  A government hospital doesnt magically recieve things such as medical equipment, it either buys the goods from the market or produces those goods itself at market costs.  Furthermore, as I mentioned before the payment of administration of government officials is incrediably lower than that of private businesses, the Security of State is one of the highest paid government administrators at $200,000 a year (only person who makes more is the president) and that hails in comparison to the tens of millions of dollars in salaries that an adminstrator in a private corporation can expect to make.