Having played all three, ( KZ2, UC2, MW2) MW2 single player is good but UC2 edges it out just because storyline is put together nicely where as MW2 starts great but switching from one part (AR) to another (SAS/141) can throw the story off a bit but MW2 does (for me) have more WTF moments then UC2 had. UC2>MW2 by alittle
KZ2 doesn't compete with UC2 or MW2 with single player but multiplayer it can hold its own and UC2 is the same way but Co Op for UC2 adds more replay value over KZ2 so for me its UC2>KZ2. Now it comes down to multiplayer for UC2 and MW2 and since some PS3 owners are bitching about the DLC for MW2 (which they get after the 360 version) it may lower the excitement for MW2 for others but having actually played the game having loved CoD4 multiplayer it will definitely be worth the $60. So having loved CoD4 MP MW2>UC2 by alot.
UC2 is one of greatest games I have ever played but I just had that mind set when I got it " this will get me through until MW2" because CoD4 was that addicting. For me MW2 looks (having played SP and seeing the multiplayer videos) like and plays like it may dethrone UC2.
GamerTag/PSN ID JoshmyersBV (please add me I have 2 friends on Xbox Live)







