libellule said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Rainbird said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
libellule said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Of course Eurogamer would pick GT5P. The GT series is the chosen game of Europe, period. |
except that eurogamer gave Halo3 a 10/10
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/halo-3-review
and believe me, it is far from what others european site have given to this good (but far from perfect) game ...
|
Thats cool bro, but the GT series is still the main console brand of Europe. America barely cares about it anymore and Japan doesn't pay much attention to it. It doesn't matter that they gave Halo 3 10/10. It is the definitive exclusive console shooter.
|
So you still think that Digital Foundry (not Eurogamer) choose GT5:P over Forza 3 because of the site they post their content on is Eurogamer?
|
Not because of the site. It is because Europe loves GT. I cannot blame them really. Every official game turns out to be the total package.
|
OK, so let's stop the shit about europe in general and let's give a rest to Halo3.
let's focus on eurogamer biais will you ?
GT3 : 10/10
GT4 : 8/10
GT5pro : 8/10
FM1 : 9/10
FM2 : 9/10
FM3 : 9/10
How do they prefer GT over FM ?
With a 92/100 on metacritic, their review looks pretty fair !!!
at your service
|
I wouldn't waste your breath. I'm giving up on this thread. The basic premise of the DF article is:
"GT5:P has overall the better rendering engine because, among other things, it can render the same track, details, etc. with more cars, better lighting, etc. at 1080p at 2xAA vs Forza 3 rendering at 720p at 2xAA."
Despite this clear, technical focus on rendering people are going "Europe loves GT", "Damange modelling", etc. etc. all of which are essentially irrelevant to the article as they pertain to other aspects of the game than graphical rendering.
