mrstickball said: A good example would be Gwen Stefani of No Doubt. |
See, here's the problem. Tragic Kingdom was a huge success, sure. However, it was mainly because they brought their unique sound to the mainstream. Return of Saturn did not sell much at all - in fact, less than their "processed" album, Rock Steady.
If Lady Gaga "going back to her roots" meant simply playing on her Piano & singing (leo-j's link), she would not have become the phenomenon she has been, because it is that which is a dime a dozen. On the other hand, her album The Fame brought its own unique sound (whether it's processed or not). This is why she got so popular.
It's true - the album may not stand the test of time. It doesn't mean she'd be any more popular if she did it any other way, though. While longetivity is necessary to reach truly massive numbers, differentiating oneself (bringing a unique sound) is actually more important. Hell, go take a look at the best selling albums ever, and you'll see plenty of "crap" (Backstreet Boys' debut make it in the top 10 best selling albums ever).
Besides, some of these artists "selling out" are simply having fun with their music. I don't see a need to hate them, just simply stop listening to them. (... or yell at the people that actually listen / buy the music)
Well, anyways, grats to Lady Gaga (though the chart's history is only 4 years).