By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
Ok. Just know that the Spanish version is wrong and not accepted scientifically.


Id like to know why then.

Well

A) It's not the accepted model by the international scientific community. (The big one.)

B) North and South America broke apart at different times, from different places.

C) The only connection between the two continents of North and South America is the Isthmus of Panma.

D) North America and South America each have their own Continental Cores.

E) They both have their own Tectonic Plates.

 

Europe being combined with Asia has more bearing then the two America's being combined ever would.

Ok, I understand that, but the way we call the continent isnt given by the way they formed, not speaking from a scientific point of view is actually a continent because of the way they found it. In english they call it the americas because  british called people in their colonies in the continent as americans, so its thier americans and the other americans(latin americans and others).

Even if they could be the same continent europe and asia will be europe and asia no matter what tectonic plates indicate, because this is a cultural or historic thing more than scientific when we are speaking oif something like how we call a country.

If you want to claim cultural reasons that seems to screw middle eastern people.  Afterall they have their own distinct culture yet have no continent.